Sioux City - EdTribune IA - Iowa Education Data

Five Districts, 27% of the Problem: Iowa's Chronic Absence Concentration

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Iowa has 327 school districts reporting chronic absenteeism data. Five of them account for more than a quarter of every chronically absent student in the state.

Des Moines Independent^↗ (6,306 chronically absent), Davenport^↗ (4,284), Cedar Rapids^↗ (4,208), Waterloo^↗ (3,562), and Sioux City^↗ (2,441) combine for 20,801 chronically absent students — 27.2% of the state's total of 76,535. These five districts enroll 17.1% of Iowa's students but produce 27.2% of its chronic absence. They punch 1.6 times above their enrollment weight.

The math of targeted intervention

If Iowa reduced chronic absenteeism in just these five districts to the statewide average of 15.8%, the state's total chronically absent population would drop by roughly 7,600 students — a 10% reduction in the state total from interventions in 1.5% of districts.

This is the concentration advantage: in a state with hundreds of districts, the chronic absence problem is concentrated enough that meaningful progress does not require 327 separate strategies. It requires five very good ones.

The challenge is that each of these five districts has a different version of the problem. Des Moines' 21.2% rate is elevated but improving fast. Waterloo's 33.5% and Davenport's 33.2% are double the state average and declining slowly. Cedar Rapids sits at 27.8%, and Sioux City at 16.9% — barely above the state average and arguably not a crisis district at all.

Sioux City: the exception in the top five

Sioux City's inclusion in the top five is a function of size, not rate. At 16.9%, its chronic rate is only 1.1 points above the state average. The district makes the list because it enrolls 14,470 students — enough that even a near-average rate produces 2,441 chronically absent students.

This illustrates a tension in attendance policy. Should intervention resources flow to the districts with the highest rates (Waterloo at 33.5%) or the highest counts (Des Moines at 6,306)? The rate-focused approach targets the worst-performing systems. The count-focused approach maximizes the number of students reached.

Concentration has been stable

The top-five share of Iowa's chronically absent population has hovered around 25-28% for most of the nine-year dataset. It dipped slightly during the COVID peak, when chronic absence became so widespread that small and mid-sized districts contributed a larger share. In 2024-25, with the statewide rate falling, the concentration rose slightly as the five largest districts improved at somewhat different paces than the rest of the state.

Des Moines alone accounts for 8.2% of all chronically absent students in Iowa — one in twelve — from a district that enrolls 6.1% of the state. If Des Moines' rate were at the state average, the district would have 4,693 chronically absent students instead of 6,306, and the state total would drop by 1,613.

Beyond the top five

The concentration extends beyond the top five. The top ten districts account for approximately 37% of all chronically absent students. The top twenty account for roughly half. Iowa's 307 remaining districts — home to more than 300,000 students — account for the other half.

This distribution has implications for state policy. SF 2435's uniform requirements — certified mail, engagement meetings, truancy designations — apply the same way in a district of 200 students and a district of 30,000. The operational burden of certified mail in Des Moines ($70,000 in postage) is qualitatively different from the same requirement in a district where the superintendent knows every family.

The most efficient path to a lower statewide rate runs through a small number of large buildings in five cities. The political and operational barriers to that approach are another matter.

Iowa publishes district-level chronic absenteeism data through the Iowa Department of Education. The IAEdTribune is an independent publication and is not affiliated with the Iowa Department of Education.

Have a tip or feedback? Contact us at theedtribune@gmail.com.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

136 Iowa Districts Are at Their All-Time High Graduation Rate

Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:00:00 GMT

This is part of the Iowa Graduation Rate series, examining trends in the Class of 2019-2024.

When Iowa's graduation data for the Class of 2024 is sorted district by district, a striking pattern emerges: 136 districts posted their highest graduation rate in the six years of available data. That is 46% of all districts with enough history to measure -- nearly half the state setting records simultaneously.

The good news is real. But it comes with a counterweight. In the same year, 87 districts posted their lowest graduation rate in the dataset. Another 72 fell somewhere in between.

Iowa's graduation story in 2024 is not a state moving together. It is a state splitting apart.

Who is setting records

The list of districts at their all-time high includes some of Iowa's largest and most prominent. Waukee^↗ at 97%. Johnston^↗ at 97%. Ankeny^↗ at 95%. Cedar Falls^↗ at 96%. Linn-Mar^↗ at 95%. These suburban districts have steadily improved throughout the data period and reached their peaks in 2024.

More surprising is the presence of some urban districts on the list. Cedar Rapids^↗ hit its all-time high at 79%. Davenport^↗ reached its peak at 78%. Dubuque^↗ at 82%. These rates are still well below the state average, but they represent genuine improvement for districts that have struggled.

Council Bluffs^↗ at 84%, Muscatine^↗ at 85%, and Clinton^↗ at 80% are also at all-time highs -- mid-size communities that have quietly reached levels they have not achieved in the data period.

Nineteen districts graduated 100% of their students. All are small -- cohorts of 25 or fewer -- where a single student's outcome determines whether the rate is 100% or 96%.

Who is at their worst

The all-time low list is led by Des Moines^↗ at 71% -- the state's largest district, at its lowest point in six years. Marshalltown^↗ at 73%. Oelwein^↗ at 67%. Clayton Ridge at 63%.

Sioux City^↗ at 86% is at its all-time low despite a rate that would seem respectable by urban standards. Ames^↗ at 86% -- home to Iowa State University -- also set a low, a result that may surprise residents of a community that prides itself on educational outcomes.

The all-time low list captures districts on downward trajectories, not just districts with bad rates. Several suburban and college-town districts joined the list in 2024 despite graduating well above the state average. Their rates are high but declining, a pattern that bears watching.

Small districts amplify both extremes

Among the 136 districts at their all-time high, 44 have cohorts smaller than 50 students. In these districts, one or two additional graduates can push the rate from 92% to 100%. The same volatility works in reverse: among the 87 at all-time lows, many are small districts where a few non-completers produced an unusually low rate.

The more reliable signal comes from mid-size and large districts. Among districts with cohorts of 100 or more, 46 hit all-time highs and 15 hit all-time lows. The split is less dramatic but still tilted toward improvement.

The distribution

The histogram of Iowa's 2024 graduation rates shows the state's bifurcation visually. The bulk of districts cluster between 85% and 100%, with a long tail stretching down to 30%. The median district graduates above 90%. But the variation below 80% has grown.

The state average of 88% falls in the middle of the main cluster. But the districts pulling the average down -- Storm Lake at 54%, Clayton Ridge at 63%, Oelwein at 67% -- are farther from the middle than the districts pushing it up. The distribution is not symmetric. It has a heavy left tail that the average does not reveal.

What the split means

A state where 46% of districts are at their best and 30% are at their worst is a state where the graduation problem is concentrating. The districts that are already strong are getting stronger. The districts that struggle are struggling more.

This is not a temporary divergence caused by the pandemic. By 2024, the pandemic's direct effects on graduation have largely washed through. The Class of 2024 entered high school in fall 2020 -- they experienced the worst of COVID disruption as freshmen, then had three relatively normal years. The split in 2024 reflects structural differences between communities, not the lingering tail of a crisis.

The Iowa Department of Education did not respond to a request for comment.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.